Ethical Factors
Most of the moral situations have been secured, depending on the guidance from Solution No. of Ministry of Wellness. Its carry out try approved by the Integrity and you will Look Chamber from the brand new Centro de Filosofia elizabeth Ciencias Humanas of one’s Universidade Government do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE Zero. 03490118.8. and Process Zero. step three.). Into the front-page of one’s online survey, there can be this new Totally free and you can Told Consent Title (FICT), and therefore presented factual statements about the risks and you may great things about reacting the study, while the be certain that of withdrawal away from agree, in the place of prejudice and also at at any time. Solely those players who looked the fresh agree alternative got entry to the analysis posts. People who didn’t see the concur choice were redirected so you can the conclusion the fresh new survey.
To investigate you can variations in PCM and you can NCM, according to the sociodemographic parameters: sex, career, care of young sisters, presence otherwise lack of somebody, and achieving or perhaps not which have people, comparisons ranging from communities have been made by using the Mann-Whitney U sample ( Table step 1).
In the 1st, the relationship between PCM and you can NCM are evaluated therefore is found that PCM (Meters = ; DP = ) correlates negatively with the NCM (Meters = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
A couple Spearman correlations had been held. 000; roentgen = -.494; roentgen dos = .24. Throughout the next data the latest dating between PCM, NCM and sixteen private and you can contextual variables was tested and can rise above the crowd from inside the Desk dos. Weak associations was basically discovered both negative and positive between PCM or NCM and you can a dozen of details looked at. Particularly the sociodemographic parameters: “level of titta pÃ¥ denna webbplats siblings” and “beginning buy” while the character points: “conscientiousness” and “transparency to try out” presented zero high correlations which have PCM and you can NCM.
Write a Comment